As it happens, the two best examples I've come across of experiential persuasion are "external" and "internal" - both of which
I've referred to before:
- The external community - and a torn PostIt(r) note!
During an
outline solution design workshop, I invited the two Business Sponsors'
representatives (originally there only as observers of process) to
comment on a tricky design choice. After some hesitation and vague
comments, I gave the nearest of them the problematic DU (as a PostIt
Note) and asked him to put it on his preferred node (and yes, I used this language
(*)). He was immediately contradicted by his fellow "sponsor", who
re-placed it nearer the user. Whereupon they both tried to grab the
PostIt, tore it in two, and put half in each place! Subsequently, both
reps' sponsors joined the Architecture Board...
(In the end it was resolved by "future proofing" the placement to accommodate anticipated requirements of a later phase. (*)
And I do not subscribe to the (once true) view that our sponsors and
other non-architect "clients" shy away from technical language when
dealing with A&D - they don't do so for the languages of other
professions)
- The internal community - "I wrote this!"
Simply put
- Solution Designers creating, and Architects curating the
Architecture. Only when I believe in something will I exploit it - and
how better to achieve this level of confidence that to have written it
in the first place? "These are the roles our solution designs will recognize as standard supported roles" (and, yes, these ABBs are indeed part of the business architecture!)
No comments:
Post a Comment